315 this year very amateurish, especially IT part, across the full taste of the blackmailer. Without accusing Apple of "8:20" joke, said not only advertising revenue at least unannounced visits to four major portals NetEase, do not say High German Android version of picking two years ago. Talk about precision marketing jiede, not only in a sensational way overestimated the capacity of precision marketing, also exaggerates the exposure of privacy.
Peep Cookie is indeed an act of invasion of privacy, but the hazard is not so big. For example, "you are a man or a woman," "how much your income" the data, not the Cookie can get. Moreover, in addition to Google this level of analysis of enterprise users have enough computing power to do things, what broken junk advertising companies can mine the data? Not that sales personnel in order to cheat the customer, intentionally deified themselves. Might even have a 315 such a exposure, their business is booming overnight. In fact, not to mention their ads precisely where not to go, even on this dinner Google, a lot of people are willing to open up more personal information to it, it now also do not have much precision.
Indeed, in today's increasingly popular smartphones, personal privacy issues worthy of attention, especially domestic service providers generally dubious circumstances. But in a mature information society, individual application scenarios and user information to make decisions for themselves. In front of a putative reliable information service provider, select personal information as open as possible, maybe you can get a very intelligent virtual assistants. It knows what information you need, know what you are going to buy merchandise, know where your potential friends, and it does not require that you request, it will automatically give you advice at the right time. So a lot of people to these temptations, always ready to hand out personal information. In fact, to achieve this win-win ideal State requires many preconditions. Paul Frank iPhone 6 Case
Start with a premise, is to assume that a service provider is trustworthy? This is not a slogan, even if Google's "don't be evil" was useless to write Enterprise basic law must depend on social mechanisms of both sanctions and rewards function. Punishment is the rule, such as "improper use of user information" clear penalties and enforcement agencies. Domestic service providers do not fly, because of lack of effective punitive enforcement mechanism. As incentives, is the business model of this service only can be developed on the basis of integrity, punishment system unreliable, this reward system in now we will not achieve much effect on the market. Such as anti-virus software now make money by manufacturing viruses, such as security applications like steal user files now ... ...
The lack of reliable service providers, we can only rely on themselves, to learn to look at the information right to open. When applications such as the installation of a mobile phone, it will prompt you to read his address book, need to know your current location, and so on. These options, read as much as possible. Today, even the flashlight application is an application to read contacts and locations, such applications can be directly deleted, don't even try. After the user has selected, modify the authorization application will secretly, this is determined by the system, and modify permissions on the security system are not allowed without authorization. So, white users generally do not brush ROM at every turn, which doesn't particularly third party ROM, after brushing, he obtained the highest permissions with your bullying, mobile hammer in one second, you have no way. Under normal circumstances, with big brand mobile phone manufacturers are presumably reliable. Copycat, us is not to be considered a privacy violation, but charges were violations of.
Most disappointing is that the application does not have the capacity to deal with user information, they want to collect this information, there was no thought of providing personalized services, but trying to use these data to do some things that only their own profit, can at least sell light will flicker advertising company. You know, few companies have enough computing power to provide mass customization services. So, open up too much personal information is necessary. Of course, except social categories of applications.
Even in a dark forest in the wonderful environment, even in the President's effort, reliable offshore service provider blocked, do not fly domestic provider of escort, digital privacy is not as vulnerable. Can help you automatically login Cookie can't peek your password for the website, as long as you don't go to fill out the questionnaire, the so-called security software does not install the stolen files, not randomly download something, don't look at the adult site not repaired computers let people, not starlets into phone ... ... So, digital privacy security, is still in the hands of users. At present, open for more personal information can be used to facilitate the time has not come, though the Cookie not as terrible as legendary, but personal information and still try to keep my live better. Banks, well-known reliable services, we really have no need for other websites too honest. In the case of a lot of companies are still doing evil without the bottom line, as a user, consider promoting the development of the information society this kind of topic is a joke. In fact, 315 hadn't reminded us also uses personal information to someone in pain haha fooled customers for advertising, many people simply do not have to consider the problem, compared to being robbed of money, what is our privacy?
Back to 315, flocks of says broadband carriers play window this year, Telecom will stop it? Now, said her mother-in-law, and kicking it? Netqin hadn't had it listed yet? If issue 315 reported is true, why is there no appropriate enforcement mechanisms can be implemented to follow up? Coupled with the excessive commercialization of operations now, 315 platform authority exactly how many? 315 this year, likely between accidentally, you expose your business privacy. Paul Frank iPhone case
2186 votes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq6ATF8Bpi0
iPhone 6 Plus
IPhone 6 Plus is the screen since Apple is the largest mobile phone products. IPhone 6 Plus HD has a 5.5-inch retina display, a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels, is iPhone 5S 185%. 7.1 mm thickness to thin more than iPhone 5S. IPhone 6 Plus a new feature, called "reachability" to complete one-handed operation of large screen phones: double-click the home health, the main interface will fell from the top of the screen, so that users can touch interface to the top without hands. Overall, the iPhone 6 Plus is a bit like a smaller version of the iPad mini.
View details of the voting >>
No comments:
Post a Comment